<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Offset Roughing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grzsoftware.com/blog/2009/02/06/offset-roughing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grzsoftware.com/blog/development/offset-roughing/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=offset-roughing</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:57:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.grzsoftware.com/blog/development/offset-roughing/#comment-7728</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 05:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grzsoftware.com/news/2009/02/06/offset-roughing/#comment-7728</guid>
		<description>Shouldn&#039;t be too much different in terms of the conformal part- when the 2D path is created it will be projected down onto the model.  The photo above doesn&#039;t reflect that since I&#039;m just working on the offset part now.  

This new offset method would eventually eliminate the parallel roughing completely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t be too much different in terms of the conformal part- when the 2D path is created it will be projected down onto the model.  The photo above doesn&#8217;t reflect that since I&#8217;m just working on the offset part now.  </p>
<p>This new offset method would eventually eliminate the parallel roughing completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://www.grzsoftware.com/blog/development/offset-roughing/#comment-7727</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 04:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grzsoftware.com/news/2009/02/06/offset-roughing/#comment-7727</guid>
		<description>Robert, how does this dovetail with your conformal roughing?

Your new offset roughing looks excellent, but seems to be cleaning at a single Z level.  The conformal roughing looks to be more akin to parallel finishing.

Are these two strategies going to form a larger roughing concept--efficient cleaning at defined Z steps and then knocking off the jaggies?

Or am I seeing it wrong?

Inquiring minds need to know (or at least WANT to...)

Randy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, how does this dovetail with your conformal roughing?</p>
<p>Your new offset roughing looks excellent, but seems to be cleaning at a single Z level.  The conformal roughing looks to be more akin to parallel finishing.</p>
<p>Are these two strategies going to form a larger roughing concept&#8211;efficient cleaning at defined Z steps and then knocking off the jaggies?</p>
<p>Or am I seeing it wrong?</p>
<p>Inquiring minds need to know (or at least WANT to&#8230;)</p>
<p>Randy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: grzsoftware.com @ 2012-02-04 05:29:41 by W3 Total Cache -->
